Randy Krum
President of InfoNewt.
Data Visualization and Infographic Design

Infographic Design

Infographics Design | Presentations
Consulting | Data Visualizations

DFW DataViz Meetup

Join the DFW Data Visualization and Infographics Meetup Group if you're in the Dallas/Fort Worth area!

Search the Cool Infographics site

Custom Search




The Cool Infographics® Gallery:

How to add the
Cool Infographics button to your:

Cool Infographics iOS icon

- iPhone
- iPad
- iPod Touch


Read on Flipboard for iPad and iPhone

Featured in the Tech & Science category

Flipboard icon

Twitter Feed
From the Bookstore

Caffeine Poster

The Caffeine Poster infographic

« Facebook's Secret Strategy Infographic | Main | InfoChimps Data API BETA program launched! »

The Shocking Disparities of Labor Cost (infographic)


From Fixr.com, The Shocking Disparities of Labor Cost visualizes how long it takes to earn the annual U.S. Minimum Wage from countries around the world.

My only criticism is that the change in area of the triangles doesn’t match the increase in time for the different countries.  The scale of the visuals doesn’t match the numbers.

Thanks to Andres for sending in the link!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

What is the message or topic of this visual? This number tells little without context; the cost of living is different in those countries as well.... or is this about outsourcing work and the reason why?
Want more context :)

June 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterChrisvdBerge

This chart raises more questions than it answers. What wage are they using to calculate the time? Is it the minimum wage in each country? If so, all we are seeing here is the ratio of each country's minimum wage to the US minimum wage (multiplied by one year). But that raises a host of other questions: What percentage of workers earn the minimum wage in each country? What is the cost of living like in each country? How is all this affected by exchange rates?

Sorry, this chart is a failure, if you ask me.

June 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJohn S.

This is extremely negligent economics.

More important than the skewed spacial presentation mentioned above, the whole premise of the chart misrepresents as "minimum wage" what appears to be merely the relationship of the countries' currencies to the US dollar. A true minimum wage has to do with what is purchasable by a person's own currency within a person's own country, not what is shown here. This chart only shows the absurd notion of what the person could buy if they were magically ported to the United States with 15,000 units of whatever his/her currency is.

Put another way: it takes an American person (in America) a year to earn a year's worth of the barest minimum amount of food and a poor quality shared housing. It does NOT take an Indian person (in India) 24 years to earn a year's worth of the barest minimum amount of food and a poor quality shared housing.

If this chart were true, Indians (in India) would all be dead within months.

If you want to keep this chart up on the site, title the post as unfortunately an example of what not to do. It is only perpetuating politically-biased terminology (in this case, left-wing).

June 16, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterk

k -- I don't think this chart shows the relationship of the countries' currencies to the US dollar. What then would explain the six month difference between France and Spain, both of which use the Euro?

June 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJohn S.

I have questions: Does the chart represents the net income (the money the worker gets on his bank account) or the labour cost (for Europe: inclusing taxes on labour). In that case countries like the Scandinavian countries and Belgium would rank high (because tax on labour cost is high) although their net income wouldn't be higher at all.

June 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFilip Meuris

Hi - This is Andres from FIXR.COM - we made the infographic to illustrate how raw earnings at minimum wage at each country differ as compared to US minimum wage. The infograph ultimately answers one question: how long does it take (under minimum wage) for a person in each country to make $15,080?

We chose to show the differences in years as we benchmarked everything to US annual minimum wage. We could have adjusted minimum wages across countries using purchasing power parity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity) but we ultimately decided to stick to raw USD equivalences to convey a single idea and illustrate it graphically (although we made a consistency mistake by having areas not be proportional with the figures as Randy rightly pointed out). Illustrating purchasing power under either averages wages or minimum wages is a very interesting idea and it makes great material for a different infographic. Any takers?

Yes, the infograph is not useful to compare purchasing power or cost of living. We believe the infograph is useful from multiple perspectives: it gives a relative idea on the power of saving while working in one country and sending the savings to a different country; it's also useful to understand how labor costs are different across countries (although there can be cost differences potentially up to ~30% range cost to account for taxes, social benefits, health insurance as incurred by employers - as those are different in each country).

Regarding Spain and France having a 6 month difference it is because their respective minimum wages accounts for France having ~1.6 times higher minimum wage than Spain which maps to the 1 yr + 4 months vs. 10 months difference (~1.6) necessary to make $15,080 (or the equivalent in EUR at the exchange rate we used when we did the infograph).

June 17, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAndres Torrubia

So if a country abolishes minimum wage (which I believe is the right thing to do), the chart would show infinite time to earn that money. Hence the more progressive a country becomes (by reducing minimum wage), the more time it will take to earn a fixed sum of money. So does this graph imply that India is more progressive than US because a higher proportional of population is allowed to work? I don't think so, which makes the graph useless for all practical purposes.

June 18, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAmbuj Saxena

Russia has not been spelt correctly.

June 29, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterTom
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.